--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > > -Well that is very interesting indeed, that Photo Rag > could absorb acid in such a quick and > devistating way. But we don't even know if it's "acid" (which begs the question of what acid it was and how the acid actually got from the newspaper to the prints). An acid is a substance that produces excess H+ ions when dissolved in water. The standard methods for measuring the acidity of paper (wet-end extract and cold water extract) depend on this. If the newspaper and print are both dry then the actual transport mechanism of excess H+ ions from newspaper to print is a metter of pure speculation. It's also pure speculation WHAT causes the discoloration. At least with conventional photo prints, the chemistry is nonproprietary and it's well understood, so we KNOW what the factors are that can cause yellowing or color shifts. With inkjet prints it could be ANYTHING. Maybe your inkjet prints will be fine unless they just happen to be exposed to dog-breath while hanging near a Pothos plant. I'll bet Wilhelm never checked for that! "But, Peter", I hear people saying, "the inkjet prints on your cube wall, taped directly under a Pothos vine, without any glass or anything, look great after two years! Doesn't that blow your whole theory?" No, I say. That's probably why the company doesn't allow dogs in the R&D facilities. Seriously, it could be ANYTHING. I live 3/4 mile from Rt 495 in Massachusetts. How about NOx emissions? I'm a painter, so how about turpenoid or mineral spirit fumes? I clean my brushes with a powerful surfactants using either alkyl polyglycosides or ethylene glycol monobutyl ether or nonylphenol ethoxylates. These irritate mucous membranes from several feet away - what will they do to inkjet prints? We have a cleaning company come to clean our house every week - who knows what chemicals are in their cleaners? The list is endless and there is nobody on any of these photography and printing forums with enough chemistry background or a detailed enough understanding of the chemistry of the paper or inks to speculate intelligently about the problem. We're all just a bunch ogf guys who don't actually know $#!+ about any of this, but thanks to what the Car Talk Guys call "male answer syndrome" we all feel like we have a right to BS about it.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Toxic yellow photorag!
2004-10-27 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.