Walter, You are absolutely right, they did change their box design because of the staining from the wood pulp. And, if I remember correctly Fuji Crystal Archive type C material had the exact same issue, with the whites yellowing in the box before the paper was even opened. When the Hahnemuhle inkjet rag papers were first unleased on the public they did it through Lumijet company. Lumijet stated that you should ALWAYS spray these prints as part of the complete process. They market their own spray, which is I belive just Lyson Printguard with their name on it. In the beginning I rarely sprayed my prints from a dye based 1200 and they are all gone. But, the ones from that same 1200 that were sprayed still look the same after 5 or so years, and you can't tell they were sprayed. I am a big believer in sprays and am willing to sacrafice a small amount of bottom end if necessary to achieve stability. My clients have never ever complained about a loss of blacks in an image that was sprayed. The idea about writing a - take care of your inkjet prints - clause on the invoice is a good one. I'm seriously considering that. You know it would be sad to find out 5-10 years from now that a lot of your prints out there are deteriorated because of this lack of protection. I am also serioulsy considering spraying all of my prints with either Printguard or Lascaux for protection. I already spray a lot of them. This Photo Rag scuffs so so easily. Just yesterday I reprinted a 24x30 for a good client because he scuffed it while removing it from his car before framing! When this happened with a 44x60 last month, well that really cost me cash. This is serious stuff with a lot of the rag papers, especially the beautuful Hahnemuhle papers. John Walter wrote: ps: way back when in the beginning days of Hahnemuhle Digital Coatings, some of their papers came yellow out of the box. I found one such box like that. It was rather alarming. That's why they changed their box from brown wood-pulb paper to the white acid free stuff no doubt . . . Just a conjecture there.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Toxic yellow photorag!
2004-10-27 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.