Yupp, that's why I tried to make it clear that it was just *my* opinion:) mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@i...> wrote: > > From: Mark Hahn [mailto:markhahn2000@y...] > > > > all the 2200 prints on glossy and lustre type papers that I have seen > > do not look as good to me as matte paper prints behind glass. the > > bronzing etc. is not terrible, but the pigment just seems to lay > > better on a matte paper. ...lots of people are happy enough with it > > on other papers, just not me... > > I really like the 2200 on Premium Luster. Even with the Matte Black ink, you > can't get as dense blacks on any Enhanced Matte. > > -- > > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > Paul mailto:pderocco@i...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] BW Printing Conclusion
2004-01-23 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.