All of the MIS B/W inksets (MIS-FS, MIS-VM, & MIS-N) are excellent choices as alternatives to the PiezoBW inkset. The only real difference is in the warmth and personal preference. Jeff Randall --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I've been through everything Piezo, and I much prefer the VM inks. For a > beginner, it would be much less money to go with the MIS VM inks. I bet > I've thrown away $600 in paper and inks setting up the Piezo system. But > I was among the first to use it and the software was very buggy, and my > 3000 printer was nothing but hassles. Today, I wouldn't expect it to > cost much in testing, as the printers are much better, but the cone inks > did display a LOT of problems with clogging and inks turning green etc. > > I am very anxious to see someone using these new piezotone inks in an > upcoming print exchange. Then I'll know for myself if they deliver > better results than the VM MIS inkset. I still MUCH prefer the VM MIS > inkset to the original Piezo inks. > > Jerry > > Robert Morrison wrote: > > > > I've been at quad printing for about a year and a half (digital printing > > since dot matrix printers in the 80's) and have tried nearly every major > > system to date. I think there is no better money spent than an initial > > piezo software purchase. You will get great prints across many different > > image files...with very little tweaking and will be able to experiment with > > papers...which in my opinion is one of the most interesting alternatives > > that inkjet printing provides over the darkroom. RGB work flows are really > > tricky from image to image and are very difficult when you switch from paper > > to paper in my opinion. The MIS VM ink set provides some interesting > > possibilities, but I would strongly encourage a beginner to get the piezo > > software with a set of Cone's new piezotones...I've used all the major ink > > sets out there and I think the piezotones blow the others away. They are a > > little more expensive...but certainly not 80%...and besides, ink is a small > > part of the final cost of a print, particularly with good paper. > > > > Robert > > > > On 6/24/02 7:12 PM, "Jerry Olson" <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > > > > > You'd get just as good results using the VM inkset and Paul Roark's > > > curves, and your ink cost would be cut by about 80 percent. Also you > > > don't need any software. > > > > > > Jerry > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] WTB: Piezography Software
2002-06-25 by jrandall1149
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.