RPN vs Algebraic
2009-04-25 by Michael

Yahoo Groups archive
Archive for 50g.
Index last updated: 2026-03-30 00:59 UTC
Thread
2009-04-25 by Michael
2009-04-25 by Alun ap Rhisiart
I can understand that part, but I admit that as a long-time HP-41C user the emphasis on algebraic in the manuals is annoying. It means everything takes so long to explain, they always give the algebraic first (even though they have been careful to make RPN quicker, entering lists etc), and sometimes don't explain the RPN way at all. I can understand the commercial reasons for giving an algebraic mode, but could wish they didn't emphasise it so much.On 25 Apr 2009, at 07:51, Michael wrote:
One thing confused me about the 50g. It's apparent schizophrenic agebraic vs RPN operation.
For example, I want to define a function. I see a stack, so I know I am in RPN mode. But I only see how to type it in as algebraic to define it.
Can someone clarify how this works?
2009-04-25 by Fatih Can
On 25 Apr 2009, at 07:51, Michael wrote:
One thing confused me about the 50g. It's apparent schizophrenic agebraic vs RPN operation.
For example, I want to define a function. I see a stack, so I know I am in RPN mode. But I only see how to type it in as algebraic to define it.
Can someone clarify how this works?
2009-04-25 by Fred Hoeldtke
----- Original Message -----From: MichaelSent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 2:51 AMSubject: [50g] RPN vs Algebraic
One thing confused me about the 50g. It's apparent schizophrenic agebraic vs RPN operation.
For example, I want to define a function. I see a stack, so I know I am in RPN mode. But I only see how to type it in as algebraic to define it.
Can someone clarify how this works?
2009-04-25 by Juan C.