renystro wrote:
and set -- if a second keypress occurs before KEYTIME has elapsed it's
ignored. If your keyboard "doubles" on some keys, which was a problem
on early examples of the 49G+, you can increase this value. In your
case (which I can duplicate) I suggest decreasing it. The commands to
recall and store KEYTIME are KEYTIME-> and ->KEYTIME (where '->' is the
right arrow, right-shift-0.) You can get them out of the CATalog, or
just type them. I suggest trying KEYTIME-> to put the current value on
the stack, dividing by 2, then ->KEYTIME to replace. The value is in
1/8192s of a second, by the way.
--
Dave Boyd
"That's sucker talk."
-- Raven, _This_Gun_For_Hire_, Universal, 1942
> When using my 48GX I've never had a problem, however on my 50G when IYes there is. There a system variable called KEYTIME which you can read
> am trying to duplicate a number (i.e. 55, 00, 88, etc.) I seem to be
> pressing the key too fast and it only records one of the numbers. It
> seems as if the system has a delay in it where it thinks I've
> accidentally pressed it twice and does not record the second one.
> After getting a couple of calcs wrong because I wasn't watching the
> screen I tried again on the 48 and had no problems. It there an
> adjustment for this in the system somewhere? I've gone through the
> manual and could not find one.
and set -- if a second keypress occurs before KEYTIME has elapsed it's
ignored. If your keyboard "doubles" on some keys, which was a problem
on early examples of the 49G+, you can increase this value. In your
case (which I can duplicate) I suggest decreasing it. The commands to
recall and store KEYTIME are KEYTIME-> and ->KEYTIME (where '->' is the
right arrow, right-shift-0.) You can get them out of the CATalog, or
just type them. I suggest trying KEYTIME-> to put the current value on
the stack, dividing by 2, then ->KEYTIME to replace. The value is in
1/8192s of a second, by the way.
--
Dave Boyd
"That's sucker talk."
-- Raven, _This_Gun_For_Hire_, Universal, 1942
