200e

Modelmaker??? wow...
Hard to get past that one.
Anyway, Ezra, I think you addressed the external audio fm before, & confirmed that fm direct from the mod esc worked better.
It wasn't clear whether this was ever something that could be addressed firmware, but beyond that, sort of related, is there any sort of behind the panel block diagrams of these modules? 
For example, does the mod osc go through conversion, or is it's path digital, versus the external in?
More questions:
Does the 261e waveshape functions occur after conversion as analog?
Could the 259e waveshape tables emulate extreme audio rate fm?


--- On Fri, 6/26/09, ezra buchla <ezra.buchla@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: ezra buchla <ezra.buchla@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [200e] 260e question
> To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, June 26, 2009, 1:42 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>             
>             
> 
> 
>       
>       they do not suffer from the same artifacts to the
> same degree
> 
> 
> 
> yasi help me make some sounds with that thing! for the
> modelmaker.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:38 AM, buchlajoe <buchlajoe@yahoo.
> com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > Hi all. Can anyone describe if the fm inputs on the
> 260e behave like the
> 
> > same fm in's on the 261e or 259e ? Or do they
> sound like a more traditional
> 
> > fm in. I find the fm in's on the 259e and 261e to
> be a bit "grainy" Thanks.
> 
> > Joe
> 
> >
> 
> >  
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>       
> 
>     
>     
> 	
> 	 
> 	
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 
>

really hating yahoo's stupid sidebar formatting right now....

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, don hassler <dlh30039@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> Modelmaker??? wow...
>








you know, we need to record demonstrative parameter sweeps for the line6
plugin . haha



>
> Hard to get past that one.
> Anyway, Ezra, I think you addressed the external audio fm before, &
> confirmed that fm direct from the mod esc worked better.
> It wasn't clear whether this was ever something that could be addressed
> firmware, but beyond that, sort of related, is there any sort of behind the
> panel block diagrams of these modules?
>









the ext. audio is sampled, as you'll realize is necessary since the
pre-waveshaping sines (main and mod) are digital ( was i've mentioned here
before). digital phase incrementing == no drift, recall arbitrary
frequencies with precision, etc

so the internal modulation can all be calculated in one fell swoop, no block
diagram required, not so for arbitrary audio



> For example, does the mod osc go through conversion, or is it's path
> digital, versus the external in?
>





it's all a bit mixed up really, and the terms don't always mean what people
expect them to

>
> More questions:
> Does the 261e waveshape functions occur after conversion as analog?
>





yes the waveshaper is 100% analog, very close to old 258


>
> Could the 259e waveshape tables emulate extreme audio rate fm?
>





no, i don't think so. they can emulate extreme gnarly audio kahunas though.


(sorry, i am thinking about the beach today.)

>
>  __._,_.__
>   Recent Activity
>
>
>
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/200e;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOWFoNjRqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE0NDkzMTQzBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTAzMjE0NARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEyNDYwMzkwNzE->
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On Jun 26, 2009, at 11:33 AM, ezra buchla wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, don hassler <dlh30039@yahoo.com>  
> wrote:
>> More questions:
>> Does the 261e waveshape functions occur after conversion as analog?
>
> yes the waveshaper is 100% analog, very close to old 258


Typo... it is very close to the old 259, not the 258.

- C

Chris Muir
cbm@well.com	
http://www.xfade.com