really hating yahoo's stupid sidebar formatting right now.... On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, don hassler <dlh30039@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Modelmaker??? wow... > you know, we need to record demonstrative parameter sweeps for the line6 plugin . haha > > Hard to get past that one. > Anyway, Ezra, I think you addressed the external audio fm before, & > confirmed that fm direct from the mod esc worked better. > It wasn't clear whether this was ever something that could be addressed > firmware, but beyond that, sort of related, is there any sort of behind the > panel block diagrams of these modules? > the ext. audio is sampled, as you'll realize is necessary since the pre-waveshaping sines (main and mod) are digital ( was i've mentioned here before). digital phase incrementing == no drift, recall arbitrary frequencies with precision, etc so the internal modulation can all be calculated in one fell swoop, no block diagram required, not so for arbitrary audio > For example, does the mod osc go through conversion, or is it's path > digital, versus the external in? > it's all a bit mixed up really, and the terms don't always mean what people expect them to > > More questions: > Does the 261e waveshape functions occur after conversion as analog? > yes the waveshaper is 100% analog, very close to old 258 > > Could the 259e waveshape tables emulate extreme audio rate fm? > no, i don't think so. they can emulate extreme gnarly audio kahunas though. (sorry, i am thinking about the beach today.) > > __._,_.__ > Recent Activity > > > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/200e;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOWFoNjRqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE0NDkzMTQzBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTAzMjE0NARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEyNDYwMzkwNzE-> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [200e] 260e question
2009-06-26 by ezra buchla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.