I kind of agree with this The guy doesn't have to like it - he's perfectly free to pan something if it's not his cup of tea. Everyone has biases however, although I guess reviewers have more of an obligation to thwart those off than bloggers do. Inaccuracy is another issue and a real problem for me in journalism. © wrote: > the SOS 200e review is filled with so many technical inaccuracies and biased > opinions that I would hardly base a purchase on what it has to say. > > you would think a large publication like Sound on Sound would employ people to > check their facts prior to print. it appears not to be the case however, as > far as the 200e review is concerned > > shame, I was looking forward to it. > -r > > > noela_synth <noela_synth@yahoo.com> wrote: Can someone forward me the s0s > review? > I am about to purchase a 200e and would like to read it! > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Air sampler Sampler soil > Soil sampler > Sampler Guitar synthesizer > Korg synthesizer > > --------------------------------- > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > Visit your group "200e" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > 200e-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
Re: [200e] s0s review?
2005-11-28 by Peter Grenader
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.