Why be so frugal with space. If we wanted to make do with a little
space we'd have nice litte synthesizers with little chicklet sized soft
buttons under tiny menu-filled LCD screens. Since we are those of the
knob and switch and jack point persuasion, I'll have as many of those
as possible, and thank you. If we can make use of the dead space
currently vacant on the Superladder, then why not a 3U panel? If we can
fit 3 eg's on two panels, then what increased function does an 1U
module make possible? With the demands of functionality met, I still
want my synth to take up a lot of real estate in my control room. I
want people to be compelled towards it while in its vicinity, and learn
that great size engenders great sound, and give up their puny
insignificant little digital boxes.
Paul
--- In motm@y..., markus <n0nspaz@l...> wrote:
> my belated votes- one of each of the following:
>
>
> > > >1. Oakley Wavefolder 2U (10 votes)
> > > >2. Oakley Superladder some of you want 3U, some want 2U (7 votes) [2u]
> > > >4. Oakley VCO 2U (4 votes)
> > > >7. Blacet Klangwerk 2U (2 votes)
> > >
> > > Am I the only one that sees the utility of a 1U 4 knob Oakley AD/AR
> > module? I
> > > think this would be much more useful than the triple 2U version with shared
> > > AD and AR controls.
>
> this 1u AD/AR gets my vote.
>
> -mark