my naive $.02 on the sequencer thing.
i vote for the 'modular sequencer' idea where one starts first with, say a
basic 1x8 module which then interfaces to.... (purchase #2) some kind of
master brain module for the sequencer modules(a 1u or 2u module with
functions for the daughter modules). would it actually be possible to buy
as many sequencer modules as one liked ?
mark scetta
At 03:56 PM 1/29/01 -0800, you wrote:
> >I agree with Dave, if too much is added then it is no longer a "simple"
> >sequencer. Personally, all I would really want is 8x2 with gate time
> >(global or per step, wicever is easier for Paul to do), internal or
> >external clock and a couple of run directions (foreward, backward etc...).
> >I could spend month using just those features. I've found that more
> >features does not always mean better. Sometimes you can get lost in too
> >many options and never get anything done.
>
>From: davevosh@...
> >Reply-To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> >To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Re: [motm] No kitchen sinks in sight
> >Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:12:28 EST
> >
> >In a message dated 01-01-29 07:42:55 EST, you write:
> >
> ><< How about a simple 16 step with 3 position switches for each step? >>
> >
> >
> >
> >i think i see pauls point on this one - a simple, "quick and dirty" 8x2
> >sequencer in the short term with a review and decision process on the
> >"ultimate" sequencer. i`ve been interested to see the ideas tossed about
> >and
> >so many of them are worthwhile but not in this module. creeping
> >feature-itis
> >will only slow down the delivery date and raise the price. my experiences
> >may
> >be different than some but i believe that there is definitely a place for
> >simple sequencer modules ( or 2 or 3..... ) even when the "kitchen sink"
> >unit
> >will also be added to the system later.
> >best,
> >dave v.
> >
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
>