The Moog 960 sequencer had all 3 rows affected by the Run/Skip/Stop switch.
Combining multiple rows for 1x16 or 1x24 requires a 961 sequential switch.
There are two more features of the 960 that are worth noting:
- The third row can be used to control the timing of the clock - not very useful if
you want to sync to something else though.
- Each stage has a V-trig output that you can combine together in the 962 sequencer
interface so that only certain outputs cause triggers. You can also vary the gate
time on the 962 but not for each stage.
I like the idea of being able to control the gate time for each stage but that may
have to wait for DoMAS or something else; just don't make it something that you have
to go through 5 levels of menus to get to! I agree that the goal here is a ∗simple∗
step sequencer! If Paul does the design right with a PIC (encoders for each step
rather than just pots), lots of programability might be available later...my guess.
Eric
--- norman fay <
NFAY@...> wrote:
> In message <005601c089fd$7a79aea0$023f240a@...>, Paul Schreiber
> <synth1@...> writes
> >But what about 1 x 16 mode?
> >
> >Paul S.
> >
> Well...er....
> how is it implemented in the moog sequencer?
> I assume the same switch settings would apply to knobs 1-8 and 9-16. A
> compromise, sure, but I'd actually put this feature above a 1 x 16 mode
> in the desirability stakes...I think most users would usually use 2 x 8
> mode, and have pitch & filter cutoff sequenced
> best etc
> --
> norman fay
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/