But what about 1 x 16 mode?
Paul S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "norman fay" <NFAY@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 7:43 AM
Subject: [motm] run/skip/rest(?)
> In message <000d01c089f7$0206c760$023f240a@...>, Paul Schreiber
> <synth1@...> writes
>
> (of sequencer switch suggestion)
>
> >That's $74 worth of switches!!
> >
> >Paul S.
> >
> IMO run/skip/rest switches for each stage is THEE essential feature on
> an analogue sequencer. To explain, yr sequencer is laid out thusly:
>
> row 1 O O O O O O O O
>
> row 2 O O O O O O O O
>
> switch I I I I I I I I
>
> right? (O represents knob, I represents 3-position switch (like on for
> example motm410 for lfo selection)
>
> when the stage's switch is in the middle, the stage runs as normal,
> switch it one way, and you get a rest, IE the sequencer doesn't output a
> trigger, switch it the other way, and the sequencer skips to the next
> stage.
>
> doing it this way means you only use 8 switches = $37. Well worth it,
> in fact, I'd put this over an internal clock in terms of importance. I
> believe the Moog modular sequencer did this, but many others, even
> including serge's fancy sequencers don't implement it, yet I believe
> it's not too difficult to implement.
>
> You can hear what can be done with thios feature on T. Dream's "rubicon"
> lp. It's a good 'un!
>
> that's my opinion, anyway, for those of you who give a ∗∗∗∗ ;)
>
> best etc
> --
> norman fay
>
>
>
>