Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] SuperMoe feature

From: jwbarlow@...
Date: 2001-01-28

Again, I didn't see the original post, but....

In a message dated 1/28/2001 9:43:49 AM, hendrysr@... writes:

>--- revtor@... wrote:

>> here's my request two knobs per step. CV and gate
>> length (time).. with
>> the gate length set to 0 then there wouldn't be a
>> gate signal for that step
>> and with it set to max (depending on clocking speed)
>> the gate would tie from
>> one note to the next.. basic, useful feature.

If something like this were implemented, I'd hope that the gate duration
stages could be switched to provide just a simple second row of CV stages. I
don't think the gate duration controls would be that useful since I prefer to
be able to deal with gates (and envelopes) independently of position of CVs
(like a cycle of seven envelopes against a cycle of eight CV stages). And if
MOTM ever has a VC Gate Delay module (especially if it has an inverting
output), one could use this to provide gate duration from a second CV row.

I like the quantized and non quantized outputs too!
JB