Tony,
Just one last thought. How about making just a 7 step sequencer? Who says you need
8 steps? Buchla and Serge had sequencers with odd numbers of steps. Of course,
allowing for shorter numbers of steps will have the same effect but not by
default...
Either way, I'm going to order one. The sequencer part is certainly a "bonus" but
not the primary reason to get the UEG, particularly since Paul has relented on a
basic sequencer!
Eric
--- Tony Karavidas <
tony@...> wrote:
> The screening is done...I should be getting my entire production run back
> any day now. Fortunately, the processor on the module is
> in-circuit-programmable, so as I scramble to wrap up this project, it
> doesn't impact production time.
> I think I'm going to leave it alone and have 7 stages adjustable with the
> "8th" stage set by the target oscillator. It actually works pretty well, and
> as Moe mentioned the bad UI design issue is avoided.
>
> BTW, Robert...I fixed the problem you noticed. :)
>
> Tony
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hendrysr@... [mailto:hendrysr@...]
> > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 3:22 PM
> > To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [motm] Re: UEG question
> >
> >
> > I like the idea of having control of all 8 levels. If the screening
> > is not done yet, maybe something creative can be thought of to deal
> > with Moe's concern. I am looking forward to getting mine in any case.
> > Larry Hendry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/