| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
> >Hint: it has to do with ∗chemistry∗, not "electronics".Bzzzzzzzzttt!
>
> [waving arm in air]
>
> I know. I know. Pick me. Pick me.
>
> It's because electrons are negatively charged and flow from -
> to +, contrary to common misconception of + to -. I think the
> military teaches it the right way.
>
> -Cary