Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
  topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] Wiard Mini-wave review pt. 2

From: "Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)" <noise@...>
Date: 2000-09-12

I'm somewhat confused; why does the mini-wave need an input driver? What
are you driving? I thought the mini-wave was a sound source by itself...

--PBr

> -----Original Message-----
> From:Dave Bradley [SMTP:daveb@...]
> Sent:Monday, September 11, 2000 10:20 PM
> To:motm@egroups.com
> Subject:[motm] Wiard Mini-wave review pt. 2
>
> OK, so to get the best performance out of this system you've got to
> calibrate it. The input waveform needs to be precisely -5V to +5V to
> play all the samples in any given wavetable. I found my 300s to have
> slightly less amplitude than that. I trimmed the Wiard's input gain
> and offset and watched the output on a scope to get a good clean sine
> wave output (using a sine wave sample, natch). You could do the same
> 2 trims by ear, since you can easily hear when the sine distortion is
> at a minimum. I also found that using my 320 was not optimal after I
> had the Mini-Wave calibrated to the 300s, which were pretty
> consistant with each other. So I may look into some precision
> resistors around the 300 VCO and 320 LFO waveshaper circuits, to get
> exactly 10V peak to peak outputs for all modules which might drive a
> Mini-Wave.
>