I concur with both of these.
At 03:23 PM 08/24/2000 -0000, "Dave Bradley" <
daveb@...> wrote:
>1. As CV increases, time increases (slower)
At least (almost) everyone seems to be in complete agreement on this!
(After all, it has been labeled "time" CV, not "frequency"/"rate" CV)
>2. Larry is correct on the jack. You can add external reversible
>attenuators later, or use ones already on your MOTM filters, but you
>can never add the trigger out jack, so build it in.
Exactly! Running the EG output through an inverter or the
reverse-attenuating input of the module it's controlling is no problem;
getting an end trigger out of an EG that doesn't have a trigger out jack is
next to impossible without mods.
-Doug
ceres@... >Moe
>
>--- In motm@egroups.com, "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@i...> wrote:
>> HA HA. The first two responses took opposite directions. Just
>goes to show
>> you will not be able to please all. However, you certainly have a
>great
>> looking product.
>>
>> My vote: Jack selection - Trigger out. NOT because I have any
>idea how I
>> would use that exactly right now. I might actually use "-out" more
>often.
>> BUT, that function is available simply using a reversing attenuator
>from
>> your system. There is no way to get trigger out unless it is built
>into the
>> modules (we never say "no" way). Now, to throw a kink in it all, I
>will say
>> that the EG graphic is now so small, I would ditch it. Use the
>space for
>> the extra jack and put them both on.
>>
>> TCV - I agree with DaveVosh. More voltage = slower.
>>
>> Larry Hendry
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Jeffrey Pontius <jpont@k...>
>> Jack = OUT- definitely
>> TCV direction = either way
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <davevosh@a...>
>> Jack = i think the "trigger out" function would be more useful.
>> TCV = my "vote" is for longer segment times ( slower - ? )
>> with increasing control voltages.