1. As CV increases, time increases (slower)
2. Larry is correct on the jack. You can add external reversible
attenuators later, or use ones already on your MOTM filters, but you
can never add the trigger out jack, so build it in.
Moe
--- In motm@egroups.com, "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@i...> wrote:
> HA HA. The first two responses took opposite directions. Just
goes to show
> you will not be able to please all. However, you certainly have a
great
> looking product.
>
> My vote: Jack selection - Trigger out. NOT because I have any
idea how I
> would use that exactly right now. I might actually use "-out" more
often.
> BUT, that function is available simply using a reversing attenuator
from
> your system. There is no way to get trigger out unless it is built
into the
> modules (we never say "no" way). Now, to throw a kink in it all, I
will say
> that the EG graphic is now so small, I would ditch it. Use the
space for
> the extra jack and put them both on.
>
> TCV - I agree with DaveVosh. More voltage = slower.
>
> Larry Hendry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeffrey Pontius <jpont@k...>
> Jack = OUT- definitely
> TCV direction = either way
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <davevosh@a...>
> Jack = i think the "trigger out" function would be more useful.
> TCV = my "vote" is for longer segment times ( slower - ? )
> with increasing control voltages.