Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] Universal Event Generator - Last question

From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...>
Date: 2000-08-24

HA HA. The first two responses took opposite directions. Just goes to show
you will not be able to please all. However, you certainly have a great
looking product.

My vote: Jack selection - Trigger out. NOT because I have any idea how I
would use that exactly right now. I might actually use "-out" more often.
BUT, that function is available simply using a reversing attenuator from
your system. There is no way to get trigger out unless it is built into the
modules (we never say "no" way). Now, to throw a kink in it all, I will say
that the EG graphic is now so small, I would ditch it. Use the space for
the extra jack and put them both on.

TCV - I agree with DaveVosh. More voltage = slower.

Larry Hendry

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeffrey Pontius <jpont@...>
Jack = OUT- definitely
TCV direction = either way

----- Original Message -----
From: <davevosh@...>
Jack = i think the "trigger out" function would be more useful.
TCV = my "vote" is for longer segment times ( slower - ? )
with increasing control voltages.