I'm jumping in a little late and half-cocked here, but...
I'd think I'd like to see it shortened to 5 segments (I.E., loose segments
5, 6, and 7) and have a "trigger out to next EG" added to put another in
series.
I think that the graphic should stay, definately.
LEDs are pretty.
Making the whole thing 3 or 4U wide is better than squashing the knobs
vertically. I like fat knobs. (Or is that phat knobs?)
Loops are excellent-- although I don't know much of the loop functionality
is compromised by removing segments-- perhaps more segments could be kept if
they would fit in a very wide (4U) panel. Most likely, making the knobs
accessable to someone with heavy / large fingers is most important-- that's
part of the MOTM attraction to me.
Because the current MOTM form factor gives us 4 knobs vertically w/ room for
jacks and whatnot below... perhaps you could have a 4U panel with the first
4 time / level knobs in the first 2U, and the latter 4 time / level knobs in
the second 2U. I don't know where the switches would end up...
Thanks for letting me blurt my random 2 cents!
--PBr
> -----Original Message-----
> From:Tony Karavidas [SMTP:tony@...]
> Sent:Monday, August 21, 2000 9:26 PM
> To:motm@egroups.com
> Subject:RE: [motm] MOTM compatible module
>
> Ok, here's a slightly modified version:
>
> (Same name, link provided for convenience)
>
> http://www.encoreelectronics.com/motm/ENVGEN2.JPG
>
>
> The numbers around the knobs are gone, the stages have indicators above
> the
> LEDs and the graphic is a little larger. (The name changed a bit too.)
>
>
> Better...or worse?
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>