Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] MOTM compatible module

From: alt-mode <alt_mode@...>
Date: 2000-08-21

Tony,

Very cool indeed! Here's my comments:
- It is kinda tightly packed. I'd be willing to go for 6 stages to get more room.
- I do like the pairing of the time and level controls
- I don't think the individual stage LEDs are very useful. If you need a LED, put
one on the output so it brightens in proportion to the signal.
- I didn't get the TCV input. What's that?
- I also don't get the switch on the lower right. I initially thought it was for
exponential vs. linear but I don't get the relationship between the three choices.
Maybe this is because I haven't used Casios...
- The numbers around the knobs are OK but as I said above, reducing the number of
stages might make it look neater.
- An absolutely crucial element for such an EG is the minimum attack time. I hope
this is in the very few ms range!
- Are you planning to use the same mechanical stuff as Paul (e.g. panels, paint,
graphics, etc.)?

It would be nice to see the high quality MOTM form factor used in more compatible
modules. It would be a nice to have high quality competition to the
Doepfer/Analogue Systems/Analogue Solutions and Paia/Wiard/Blacet/FracRac stuff. I
hope there are others out there, either offered through Paul or otherwise!

Eric

--- Tony Karavidas <tony@...> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> It seems like this is "sneak peek" week, but it truly is a coincidence. This
> image is my first graphic attempt and I was interested in your feedback.
>
> http://www.encoreelectronics.com/motm/ENVGEN2.JPG
>
> It has 5 toggle switches along the right side (which aren't drawn in, there
> are just white holes in place). They perform various functions and I'm not
> going to explain them in hopes the text and graphics can do it for me. If a
> majority of you ask "what's that do" then I guess the image WILL need
> further explanation. I'm looking for feedback regarding the numbers around
> the pots, the missing numbers, and if it looks ok without them, the lack of
> the stage indication (I thought there were too many numbers cluttering up
> the panel as it is). Maybe there should be no numbers around the pots, but
> SHOULD be numbers for each of the stages. Is the graphic near the bottom
> useful? Is it in the way? Stuff like that.
>
> Anyway, this module is quite real, and I think will be a good addition to
> Paul's lineup. A 4 stage ADSR is not enough for me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony Karavidas
> Encore Electronics
>
> http://www.encoreelectronics.com
>
> Designers of "The best MIDI to CV converter on the planet." -Keyboard Oct.
> 1997
>
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail � Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/