Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: Test

From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...
Date: 1999-02-17

I am working ∗exactly∗ along these lines.

VC waveshape is pretty hard to define. But...with a '700 VC Router, you can
certainly VC ∗select∗.

Paul S.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Bradley <daveb@...>
To: motm@onelist.com <motm@onelist.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 10:09 AM
Subject: [motm] Re: Test


>From: "Dave Bradley" <daveb@...>
>
>
>> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>>
>> Everyone's waiting for me to get the 700's out (today and tomorrow)
>> and the VCOs out (pcb test boards back Friday).
>>
>> On another note (so to speak) I am working on a tripe VC bandpass filter
>> module ans am thinking about redesigning the VC LFO to include
>> variable waveshaping.
>
>Cool! The MAM triple bandpass uses Vactrols, but I don't know enough about
>them to understand exactly where you would use them in the circuit, and how
>this is a good thing. Are you thinking along these lines?
>
>I'd vote for variable waveshaping on the LFO, especially if it is voltage
>controlled!
>
>Dave Bradley
>Principal Software Engineer
>Engineering Animation, Inc.
>daveb@...
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
>to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
>select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
>