and if remember correctly, i don't think the 820 lag has a lag time as
high as 30 seconds. I think it was around 5 sec or shorter. -Nate
jwbarlow@... wrote:
> Damn! This patch won't work in the way I described since the 820
> appears to
> have no HOLD input (a gate input which holds the output constant
> regardless
> of the input). You'd have to have another S/H in front of the VC LAG
> input in
> order to keep the input from changing (and the output slowly following
> that
> input).
>
> Now it's getting expensive!
> JB
>
> In a message dated 6/20/2000 1:27:38 PM, jwbarlow@... writes:
>
> >Now another idea for the 820 LAG PROCESSOR module:
> >1) Take a CV source to the input of the 820 (e.g., noise).
> >2) Take the 820 output to the input of the 100 (or 101) S/H.
> >3) Take the 100 output to a CV input (say a 1v/oct of an oscillator).
>
> >4) Set the lag time to be rather long (like say a 5 octave sweep in
> thirty
> >
> >seconds).
> >5) Set the S/H level all the way up.
> >
> >This great patch (which I learned from the old Serge manual) keeps
> step
> >size
> >small but allows for a full 10V peak to peak swing for the total
> voltage
> >
> >output over time. This means that (in the patch example given above)
> any
> >two
> >adjacent notes must be close together, but over time a full ten
> octaves
> >would
> >be covered.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>