Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] test -sorry

From: jwbarlow@...
Date: 2000-05-10

>> Okay, I'll pipe up. I just finished a MOTM 410 and spent the
>> last two hours running a single VCO through the unit and twiddling.
>>
>> One word; Awesome.
>
>Nice to hear this !
>

I just want to concur with Tomy here (sorry to repeat myself listers). This
was a module I fully intended NOT to buy (I thought I didn't need a BP, and I
kind of didn't like the idea of internal LFOs) .... then I heard Paul's demo
file and it turned me around completely, I had to get one (and I'm glad I
did).

Which leads me to mention some of the reasons why we're glad to have you
here, JH. You clearly have at least two areas of interest in your designs,
one being the "classic circuits" (as seen with the MOTM 420, 410, 440), with
the second being powerful and novel modules (like the MOTM 320, and 820 --
which I've heard SO MUCH ABOUT from one list member). I've always been more
interested in the second much more than the first since most modulars I've
used only had that brand of VCF (no choice about topology), but you and Paul
have really turned me around on that one. I hope those who are more
interested in the classic modules will similarly find the more powerful and
exotic modules a great surprise.


In a message dated 5/8/2000 7:02:47 PM, synth1@... writes:

>c) The NJR4558 is still available (world's best cheap audio amp, period!)
>However, as I recall, there
>was an issue with the Ibanez TS series that only ∗certain date codes∗ of
>4558s are desired.

Yeah, one of the things that Keen mentions is that you can order JRC4558s,
but you receive NJR4458s (which are claimed to sound bad -- remember we're
talking guitar players here). The magic ones are said to be JRC4558D.

I tend to like my guitar to go preamp to the 410 (no other effects). I
typically use the wa (or flanger) pre distortion -- counterintuitive, but
much more intense sounding.


In a message dated 5/8/2000 11:30:18 PM, thudson@... writes:

>BTW, would it help to send back any of the packaging? All those
>nicely labeled "MOTM-xxx RESISTORS", "MOTM-xxx CAPACITORS",
>etc? Maybe my wife has finally converted me to the ultimate
>recycling fanatic, we have more recycling than trash.

I agree here! I've got a garage full of styrofoam packing material and a
thousand bags labeled "organic solder".

BTW, someone mentioned putting "weed" in these bags. While that reference is
clearly Stooge protected material (they're movin into out turf guys!) there
are good reasons not to do that.
1) It's illegal!
2) It damages short term memory.
3) Electronic components contain all kinds of bad stuff like solvents, oils,
and other chemicals and lead -- which you probably don't want to be ingesting.
4) It damages short term memory.

JB