Hmm...
1) cheap crap-o shit CTS open-frame carbon trim pots (just like the original
921!)
2) open-frame panel carbon pots (worse than the original 921!)
3) No coax on audio leads
Sorry. I'll take a MOTM-300 VCO. Cheaper, too!
Paul S.
----- Original Message -----
From: J. Larry Hendry <jlarryh@...>
To: <motm@egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:33 PM
Subject: [motm] Cincinnati Moog vaporware & phaser questions
I know most people on this list probably know the story of the three Moogs.
It's kind of like the three little bears, except papa Moog has a new name
and baby (Cincinnati) Moog has been a very bad boy allegedly stealing
people's deposits for re-issue MiniMoogs that never came to be and
allegedly stealing some university's modular under the guise of repair.
So, I thought it interesting when I saw this on E-bay. Those of you that
may have original Moog VCOs, I am wondering how the construction compares.
I wonder how man modules were actually made and sold. I also wonder if any
of it was worth a damn from a construction. Not that I am interested in
any of it mind you. I already have found a good source of high quality
modular <snicker>. However, from a curiosity and historical standpoint....
Well, you see...
Larry (the stooge with the funny hair) Hendry
----------------------------
Title of item: MOOG 9501 (901) VCO MODULE
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=313298469
Item Description:
You are bidding on a reissued Moog 9501 (901) VCO module.
This was remanufactured by Moog Music in Cincinnati
<snip out several boastful claims about quality>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get paid for the stuff you know!
Get answers for the stuff you don't. And get $10 to spend on the site!
http://click.egroups.com/1/2200/3/_/529958/_/956719602/
------------------------------------------------------------------------