I know Paul in general is not in favor of the idea. But maybe sometime next
year? These would have to be "unique" in some respect and really have an
MOTM sound to them. Something you couldn't get anywhere else. Some natural
grange (Not the artificial stuff Paul pushes. Ha!) is a good thing for me.
Too clean are the MOTM modules? I love quality! Quality grunginess too!
The PEQ would be great if the quality were very high. Perhaps a low, high
and two sweepable mids? VC levels or frequencies? Yeah baby! (Shagadelic
lingo in full effect!)
I like the idea of a true spring reverb.
--Todd
> From: cparker@...
> Since the topic-du-jour appears to be possible future MOTM
> modules, I would like to ask the list members what their opinions
> are about "effects" modules. By this I mean any of the
> following: 1) Parametric Equalizers (ala the Moog Fixed Filter
> Banks) 2) Reverb/Echo Units (usually spring-controlled) 3) Any of
> the various and sundry Chorus, Flanger, and Phase Shifter modules
> found on old Analog Modulars. Is it the general concensus of the
> group that these sorts of things are better handled externally by
> one of today's multiple-effects boxes (ie- d∗g∗t∗lly)? This
> would leave more room for additional oscillators, filters, etc.
> in your racks. Just thought I'd ask!