> From: JWBarlow@...
> Larry, I also thought of a simple patch which might give you some idea of
why
> an analog sequencer is useful.
>>>---snip out details to avoid duplication---<<<
> Hours of fun! Technically a sequencer, but not really. A real sequencer
is
> much more powerful obviously.
Thanks John. I will ponder on this patch for a while.
> Thanks, Larry, for your digital sequencer insights. I'm wondering if
anyone
> has ever used a (hardware) digital sequencer that has editing
capabilities,
> and how they were implemented?
My experience has been mostly with hardware sequencers. I software
sequencers are fine but sometimes inspiration and my computer don't mix.
One of the easiest I ever used was the old Alesis MMT-8. Its only fault,
no storage, you needed a separate disk drive. hence the "data disk". The
the data disk SQ which was cool for storage for the MMT-8 or as a stand
alone playback device for stage (no editing).
Today I use the hardware sequencer mostly in my T1. Editing is about as
good as software jobbies on most decent sequencers. I hope that's waht you
meant by "hardware."
Thanks again for the "patch". This modular is a whole new ball game for
me.
Later,
Larry