Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: clocking the 410

From: "Alexander S. Dickey" <perpetual@...>
Date: 2000-03-31

> ????
>
> The 410's built in LFO does not have sync capabilities. However if you have
> a 320, you should be able to sync it to the 606 trigger, and plug it in to
> the 410 overriding the internal LFO.

i think i'm confused between sync and voltage controlled. forgive my
newbiness.

> The mysterious resistor just changes the audil input gain of the filter,
> optimizing it for the weaker signals outside the MOTM system.

ah, okay. easy one.

> Right. Let me be more clear if I was not before: I was sending triggers to
> the 800 EG and the 320 LFO. The LFO and EG were then modulating the 420--it
> had nothing to do with the 120. The 120 was just supplying audio into the
> filter and wasn't being modulated itself. What Dave said is intelligent--use
> the 320 to override the internal LFO of the 410.

okay, but feeding the trigger out of the 606 into the 120 does produce a
sound, albeit a rather limited click.

> Now, having said that, let me stir up the pot again--set up the patch the
> same way (audio into 120,

see, i can't get sound if i audio out of the 606 into the 120. it was
the first thing i tried upon building it.

> 120 into 420 or 440, trigger into 320 and 800, 320
> and 800 modulating FM1 & FM2 of 4X0), then send a separate LFO output into
> the "B" input of the 120 in cross mode, with "to taste" settings of the
> suboctaves. Playing with the shape and rate of the LFO, you may be able to
> get stepping out of the 120 that's rhythmically compatible.

okay, that works. i can clearly see i'm going to need more modules!
but isn't that always the case?

alex