Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: VCLFO Part #2

From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...
Date: 1999-05-03

> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>
> Things I missed:
>
> a) the TRI out is unaffected by SHAPE, it's always a TRI. The RAMP at 50%
> ∗is∗ a TRI as well.
> On either side, it approaches SAWtooth.

OK, that makes sense to even me.

> b) I don't think a dual VCLFO makes sense because how could it differ
from 2
> of the 1Us? The cost
> IS THE SAME.

I agree. I would rather have two separate units (whether 1 or 2 space)
than a dual LFO if the cost is close to the same.

Larry Hendry