Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] VCO concept...

From: "David Bivins" <dbivins@...>
Date: 2000-03-21

Don't forget using a self-oscillating 420 (and the forthcoming 440) as a
sub-oscillator. The 420 tracks very well (though I haven't tried it over a
wide range). The sine puts an unobtrusive bed in there; if you want to give
it more presence, send it through the 120.

David.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...]
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 5:24 PM
> To: motm@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] VCO concept...
>
>
> From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...>
>
> > From: "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@...>
> >
> > Oh, okay-so the Triangle is fixed, but in essence the Sawtooth output is
> > really doing what would be done if you skewed the Triangle anyway.
>
> You got it Ken. The 320 is one of my favorite modules.
>
> And, I would like to echo the comments concerning using the 320 in the
> audio range. It bakes a much better sounding smooth sub-osc than the 120
> square waves out. Just use the 120 to sync it up, since the 1 v/oct scale
> is close but not designed to be exact (per Paul).
>
> Larry H
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 2.9%
> Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/936/3/_/529958/_/953594272/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>