Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: VCEG again!

From: jwbarlow@...
Date: 2000-03-02

Did you say free attenuators? Send me a bunch!

OK, I've looked at this a couple of times, and I have no idea what you're
talking about. Could you say it in English this time <grin>.

BTW, The reason I think VC sustain is the least useful of all the
time/voltage domains under VC (should be included, but can lose features like
an attenuator more quickly than the others):
If, for example, VC sustain is a one to one relationship (1V CV input
produces a 1V increase in the output of sustain), you can get a very similar
(possibly more useful) effect by merely summing your CV source with the
output of your EG and using that sum to control your....

Bring it on, you wusses!
JB
Hey, you gonna send me a 1U to drill for mults?


In a message dated 2/29/2000 4:01:28 PM, PaulBr@... writes:

>Hey there buddy-- I didn't notice you piping up when I mentioned slapping
>a
>basically free attenuator on the VCEG! What's this nonesence about speaking
>only when feeling strongly? ;)
>
>(To pump the idea again, it solves a niche need between having strictly
>knobby attenuator and having the full controls on the VCA! Isn't that
>keen?!? Don't you want one?!? And you don't have to think of it as just
>for audio signals-- attenuate anything with it! Yea! ;)
>