Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
  topic list next in topic

Subject: Matrix Patching & Patch Storage

From: alt-mode <alt_mode@...>
Date: 2000-03-01

Dave,

Thanks for the comments. I have worked with a VCS3 and the matrix patching can be
quite confusing. It's not very easy to visualize the patch on the matrix.
Actually, the first synth I ever played had matrix "pushbuttons"; anybody ever
played an Ionic Performer? Again, it was confusing to "see" the interconnections
between the modules with the matrix especially for someone playing a synth for the
first time without a manual!

The 2500 patching is a bit different since you use the switches to select and
interconnection between modules. What I'm wondering about is if this is any
easier/better to visualize the patch with. My guess is that it is better than an
EMS patch matrix but harder than patch cords, except when they get really tangled.

I suppose I too am addicted to patch cords; I'm just exploring other options that
can help with that modular "lateral thinking"...

Along the same lines, how do folks "store" patches from their MOTM systems? I
haven't bothered to write things down yet, preferring to have my patches as a form
of temporary "art" but I wonder if any folks just get out a notebook and write down
a block diagram or do something else. Thoughts?

Eric

--- davevosh@... wrote:
> one thing i noticed was that you asked about arp 2500 style matrix "bus bar "
> switching ( which i`ve never used... only read about and most of the comments
> about them weren`t that favorable in terms of crosstalk, panel space
> utilization / efficiency and reliability ) and the thread jumped to ems style
> pin matrix`s ( which i`ve also, sadly, never used ) but, there too, i`ve read
> lots of stuff about reliability issues, crosstalk and cv node summing errors
> that make me wonder about their long term use vis-a-vis patchcords. i`d love
> to have had the opportunity to have tried out an aks or vcs3 to find out for
> myself ! aspects of their system design / packaging are interesting and
> certainly, some very nice e.m. has come from people who use them ( or their
> gigantic cousin, the synthi100 ).
> me, i guess i`m "old fashioned" ( or was that just "old" ) ( or is the new
> buzzword "retro" - ??? ), i have found patchcords satisfactory over the years
> and never really looked for a different alternative.
> best,
> dave v.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com