previous by date | index | next by date |
previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
> From: "David Bivins" <dbivins@...>[This message contained attachments]
>
> I LIKE THIS!!! Best so far for me. Anyone else?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Bradley [mailto:daveb@...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 1:45 PM
> > To: motm@onelist.com
> > Subject: RE: [motm] VC AR EG mockup with Delay
> >
> >
> > From: "Dave Bradley" <daveb@...>
> >
> > Well, hey - here's one with delay.
> >
> > Dave Bradley
> > Principal Software Engineer
> > Engineering Animation, Inc.
> > daveb@...
> >
> > > From: hodad1@...
> > >
> > > Here's my less-than-informed notion:
> > > What about a DAR EG? Eliminate the A/R Cv pot, maybe have a
> > -OUT jack as
> > > well as a +OUT.
> > >
> > > Is that feasible/sensible etc.?
> > >
> > > tomr
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
> > > To: <motm@onelist.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 2:41 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [motm] VC AR EG mockup
> > >
> > >
> > > > From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
> > > >
> > > > This is about 100 times easier to do than a massive VC DADSR
> > super-whiz
> > > bang
> > > > module.
> > > >
> > > > Everybody like this idea??
> > > >
> > > > Paul S.