Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] VC Resonance: is it that useful?

From: "John L Rice" <Drummer@...>
Date: 2014-01-25

I rarely use it myself. Sometimes with keyboard CV and sometimes with a sequencer row but not often.

 

John L Rice

http://www.youtube.com/JohnLRice

https://www.facebook.com/ImJohnLRice

 

 

From: Thomas White [mailto:djthomaswhite@...]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 10:16 PM
To: Paul Schreiber
Cc: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [motm] VC Resonance: is it that useful?

 




Synth Nerd, check.

 

I have never found it very useful in my experience. Good option but rarely used. Velocity resonance could be good. Haven't tried that.

Thomas White

Natural Rhythm Music

www.naturalrhythmmusic.com


On Jan 24, 2014, at 9:40 PM, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:

 

Thinking ahead to new filter designs.......

Both the '440 and '480 have VC Resonance inputs. But, and let's be honest:
are they ∗used∗ all that much? One filter more than the other?

Doing this adds cost/board space that I could use elsewhere.

The only patch that comes to mind is adding a Velocity to Res, so that the
harder you play, the more resonance you have. But I think 95% of modular
owners do not 'play' them that way.

Thoughts?
Paul S.
/note this is cross-posted several places, if you are a synth nerd you will
see it multiple times