Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: VC EGs

From: "Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)" <PaulBr@...>
Date: 2000-01-31

I, too, would love a VC EG. I only fairly recently got the tip of altering
the decay based on note pitch on a EG tied to a VCA. I.E., high pitch
sounds die quickly, while bass sounds sustain. Duh. Maybe there's an
easier way of accomplishing this?

I've been reading the Sound On Sound "Synthesis Secrets" series of articles
to get me up to speed on modular synthesis. The last two have dealt with
EGs, in particular complex EGs. I'm looking forward to slaughtering some
brass-like sounds.

--PBr, who also has to struggle to balance saving for a new car, funding
household expenses, and BUYING MORE GEAR!

> -----Original Message-----
> From:David Bivins [SMTP:dbivins@...]
> Sent:Sunday, January 30, 2000 2:19 PM
> To:MOTM
> Subject:[motm] VC EGs
>
> From: "David Bivins" <dbivins@...>
>
> I just love envelope generators. But I would really, really like to have
> more control over them than just "set and tweak manually." I want VC EGs!
> Hell, while I'm requesting them again, let's make them more robust. What
> about an 8-stage envelope?
>
> I'm going to get a repetitive strain injury soon from tweaking my attack
> and
> decay times in realtime!
>
> I know what you said before, Paul, but if you make VC EGs, I will use them
> like mad. I think a lot of other people would too.
>
> Who's up for VC, bigger than ADSR (or the on-the-horizon DADSR) EGs? Speak
> up!
>
> David Bivins
>
> PS--does anyone else here struggle almost daily with the urge to sell
> almost
> all non-modular gear to fund more modular gear? Tough life ;)
>