In a message dated 1/30/2000 1:20:32 PM,
dbivins@... writes:
>I want VC EGs!
>Hell, while I'm requesting them again, let's make them more robust. What
>about an 8-stage envelope?
>I'm going to get a repetitive strain injury soon from tweaking my attack
>and
>decay times in realtime!
I agree with VC EGs, although I think 8 stages (I'm wondering what the stages
would be) is a bit much, at least for an analog module (remember, each pot
adds about $10 to the module). I also recall Paul mentioning that DoMoaS
would be a good module for multi stage envelopes in which one could define
one's own stages and their number. BTW, why don't we just start calling
DoMoaS "MOAS," since it will obviously be a killer, and not "the ninth or
tenth greatest sequencer around."
>I know what you said before, Paul, but if you make VC EGs, I will use them
>like mad. I think a lot of other people would too.
Me for example!!!
>Who's up for VC, bigger than ADSR (or the on-the-horizon DADSR) EGs? Speak
>up!
I don't know. For a dedicated analog VC EG, I think the 5 stage would be
quite impressive -- but there could be room for a uP device that could be
configured to allow weirder envelope shapes.
>PS--does anyone else here struggle almost daily with the urge to sell almost
>all non-modular gear to fund more modular gear? Tough life ;)
John (I just purchased an old truck -- with incredibly low mileage -- to
assure my continued participation in the MOTM fun) Barlow