I meant that the MOTM pots were so much nicer that they felt out of place next to the cheap Dotcom ones. If you used Alpha pots, your modules would actually fit into into that format better and be cheaper to produce as well. But It's a minor issue and probably a non-starter in your mind.
I'd be delighted to see a few MOTM modules available in Dotcom format in any case, and I'm sure that would be a popular bit of gossip with others as well.
Cheers,
Brian
On Jul 3, 2010, at 11:39 PM, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
Stuck out: in what way? note that the newer BTI pots I use are more "smoother" than the older Spectrol pots.
I would get rid of the blue Bourns pots, use all BTI pots so they 'feel' is the same everywhere in the module. The
pots are needed in the MU case as I would more than likely use a 'Stooge bracket' approach as opposed to
PEM and the BR-1 brackets. I guess a bigger issue is do I keep the MOTM knobs or switch over to Cosmo knobs?
Paul S.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Whittington" <analoguelist@...>
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] Update
Exciting news/rumor, there Paul. I'd love a 440 and 380, and perhaps a smattering of other modules in Dotcom format. In my own opinion, Dotcom versions would be best with Alpha pots, to maintain a consistent feel. That might be blasphemy to you and might not be everyone's preference, but I found that the fancy pots in MOTM format stuck out like a sore thumb when I had a converted module in my cabinet.
Cheers,
Brian
----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, July 3, 2010 10:46:40 PM
Subject: [motm] Update
Another possibility is moving Frac designs into Euro, or moving MOTM designs into MU (.com panels).
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links