[resending, sorry if it double posts. My email ISP is a flake]
> a) I know Cynthia is reading all this (HI!!) so I'll let her responsed
> ∗if∗ she decides to.
>
> Suffice it to say: the MOTM format was very successful and was the
> ∗primary reason∗ I decided to drop the kits other than time/Paul H.
> situation.
>
> Reason it out from that. Hint: it wasn't because she sold ∗39∗ of them.
>
> b) Maybe I missed doing my homework but what other 5U pulse-diving module
> that was available in Oct 2008:
>
> 1) had fractional division (/2.5, /7.5, etc)
> 2) had a stepped voltage out that tracked the clock and had switchable,
> quantized voltages
> 3) had 16 simultaneous outputs
> 4) had ∗voltage-controlled∗ dividing over the range of 1.5 to 33?
>
> I don't think ∗anyone∗ had a ∗single one∗ of these features, much less
> ∗all of them in the same module∗.
>
> c) please don't get me wrong: I'm not here pointing fingers. I'm trying to
> get a ∗concrete idea∗ what to do, because frankly Euro is stomping 5U in
> the marketplace for ∗whatever∗ reason. It's cheaper, it's smaller, it's
> "off the shelf" and has funny names. Whatever........
>
> If 5U is mostly a "solder monkey's paradise" unless a 'magical thing'
> appears that everyone wants (but no one can ∗predict∗ or visualize
> beforehand) that's a perfectly legimate thing to grasp. If 5U existing
> customers are "mature" in their rigs and only 20-40 modules per design is
> the TAM (Total Available Market) then OK, those modules are going to be
> $500-$600 (go take a gander at Modcan's prices). If .com wants to be the
> de facto 5U source, OK then. If JH is leading the way for the pc board
> market, hell I buy them, too!
>
> There is ∗no way∗ I can compete with .com, because he has 7 full-time,
> paid employees (and his wife Margo is a CPA and does all the orders/office
> stuff as well) that are supported by Arrick Robotics (www.robotics.com).
> I got me and Shane the tech.
>
> I agree that having stock it about the best solution.Been trying to get
> there for 12 years :)
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
>
>