Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: Multiple Pesonalities

From: "Crawley, Eric" <esc@...>
Date: 2000-01-27

Nice pics Nate!

I'm partial to #1 or #2. The graphics on #4 do help quite a bit. I think
#1 and #2 are the most MOTM-like in that they offer something that is
visably different from other solutions but it all boils down to what Paul
wants to build...

Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Alan Hunsicker [mailto:nate@...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 4:28 PM
> To: motm@onelist.com
> Subject: [motm] Multiple Pesonalities
>
>
> From: Nathan Alan Hunsicker <nate@...>
>
> OK, so we're torn between normaling and switches and 3 or 4
> multiples. I'm
> starting to come over to the normaling side. I've attached a
> pdf of all the
> options we could go with. On the 3 multiples idea I suggest
> we put a bank
> of 6 in the middle simply because 3 sets of 4 looks to empty and who
> couldn't use more multiples. -Nate
>
> PS: this will be my last PDF, I promise!!!
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
> ----------------------------
>
> Looking for the lowest refinance rate for your mortgage?
> GetSmart.com can help. We'll help you find the loan you
> need - quick, easy, and FREE click
> <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/GetSmartRefinance
> ">Click Here</a>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
>
>