Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: Multiple Pesonalities

From: "Tkacs, Ken" <Ken.Tkacs@...>
Date: 2000-01-27

This is good to see---thanks!

As you know, I'm partial to #4 for the sake of elegance and maximization of
panel space.

However, if we were to go with switches, I like #2. The third one is an
interesting idea, but I think it would be hard to see-(never mind get your
fingers in there)---those switches. Doubly so for case #1. The patchcords I
use have something like 2.5" deep metal 'shanks' on them, and if the
switches were cramped in there too closely I think it would be awkward.

Just my $0.02.

_Be kind-Rewind_,

Ken


-----Original Message-----
From:Nathan Alan Hunsicker [mailto:nate@...]
Sent:Thursday, January 27, 2000 4:28 PM
To:motm@onelist.com
Subject:[motm] Multiple Pesonalities



OK, so we're torn between normaling and switches and 3 or 4
multiples. I'm
starting to come over to the normaling side. I've attached a
pdf of all the
options we could go with. On the 3 multiples idea I suggest
we put a bank
of 6 in the middle simply because 3 sets of 4 looks to empty
and who
couldn't use more multiples. -Nate