Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] Re: 5U vs E350 differences

From: Jeff Laity <synthetic@...>
Date: 2009-10-23

Yeah, I'd love a micro version if it was 1u.

On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:14 AM, torikoos wrote:

>
> I see an opportunity here to release a micro and an ultra version,
> much like the current MOTM-300 and 310 .... the micro based on the
> E-350, and the Ultra being the super duper version...
> Would that work?
>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Has there been any discussion yet as to what features the "super-
> > > duper" version would have?
> > >
> >
> > What the super-duper would have different than the "standard"
> version:
> >
> > a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate
> that
> > many!)
> > b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048
> samples
> > (from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more
> 'fancy'
> > wavetables
> > c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a
> sampler) or might
> > just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading
> (then
> > it's "free")
> >
> > I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of
> the SW
> > involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more
> involved, and
> > somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader.
> >
> > Paul S.
> >


NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail�may be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer�solely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in�accordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. �