Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] 5U vs E350 differences

From: Kyle Stephens <lightburnx@...>
Date: 2009-10-19

"...somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader."

One could ask Grant Richter of Wiard for permission to hack and expand his Wave 256 program...

http://www.sonicspot.com/wave256/wave256.html

...to Wave 1024 or 2048 as it were :)

I'm no programmer, but I imagine it could be done.


_Kyle

--- On Mon, 10/19/09, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> wrote:

From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
Subject: Re: [motm] 5U vs E350 differences
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>, "Scott Juskiw" <scott@...>
Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 7:14 AM

 

> Has there been any discussion yet as to what features the "super-
> duper" version would have?
>

What the super-duper would have different than the "standard" version:

a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate that
many!)
b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048 samples
(from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more 'fancy'
wavetables
c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a sampler) or might
just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading (then
it's "free")

I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of the SW
involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more involved, and
somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader.

Paul S.