Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: MOTM-300 Question

From: "thomas white" <djthomaswhite@...>
Date: 2000-01-26

Hi Nate!

The 300 VCO is only slightly more complicated than the 320 LFO. I am still
new to the list and MOTM but I just finished building a 300 VCO, 320 LFO,
420 VCF, 110 Ring/VCA and 940 Power. The main difference is the amount of
pot/switch wiring and tighter board layout. I don't have scope either. You
can calibrate the VCO by a DVM and with your ear. There are only two
adjustments to calibrate. One is sine shape and the other is the V/Oct
accuracy. Very easy even for beginners.

Hope this helps-

Thomas White


>From: Nathan Hunsicker <nate@...>
>Reply-To: motm@onelist.com
>To: MOTM Newsgroup <motm@onelist.com>
>Subject: [motm] MOTM-300 Question
>Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 22:42:49 -0500
>
>Hello all, just a few questions about the 300 VCO. Exactly how difficult
>is this module? I worked for 2 years in robotics R&D so I know a good
>amount. Is the difficulty in assembly or calibration? I don't have an
>o-scope, is there any way i can get around getting one? (in a pinch I'll
>borrow one) What is the difference between the 300 and the Micro VCO
>expected later this year? Now that I've asked way too many questions, I
>have one good thing to say, After reading through the 320 LFO manual, I
>was expecting to see this incredibly dim LED, I was delightfully
>surprised to see it is as bright as it is, more than bright enough for
>my needs. -Nate (sitting under 2 feet of snow)
><< nate.vcf >>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com