Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: PaulBr's multiples

From: "Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)" <PaulBr@...>
Date: 2000-01-25

In my expirience with the Clavia Nord Modular, I at most chain 4 connections
(I.E., 1 source and 3 destinations), so a 4-unit multi is sufficient for me.
And you can always chain several 4-units, although wasteful. OTOH, why be
limited? This is MOTM, after all. In that respect, the 2x4 + 1x6 sounds
like a good combination, plus it has the extra-visible split in multis, and
easy mount for power distribution.

Stupid question: when soldering the jacks together, does it make any
difference if the wires are in a star configuration or networked? I would
imagine they would be best networked, for ease of solder and reliability.

Another (maybe less) stupid question: If many people can come up with a
suitably agreeable configuration, would one person be willing to do many
faceplates (rather than a one-off) (note: I am NOT NOT NOT volunteering
anyone!!!)? And if so, I would propose that we bulk-order sockets. Unless,
of course, the extra shipping/handling from the main reciever to each person
out-weighs the lower socket price. And above/beyond that, would we be
detracting from Paul S.'s business (not desirable!)?

--PBr, three nots, that's still a not.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:J. Larry Hendry [SMTP:jlarryh@...]
> Sent:Tuesday, January 25, 2000 3:24 PM
> To:motm@onelist.com
> Subject:Re: [motm] PaulBr's multiples
>
> From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...>
>
> Damn it !! I hate it when you are THAT right.
> I thought the 6 unit correctly space mult in the middle would catch a
> fancy. But, I guess 6 would rarely be used? You tell me, of "leader" of
> the Stooges <snicker> Ever thin you need more than 4 in a mult?
> Larry H
>
> ----------
> > From: Dave Bradley <daveb@...>
> > To: motm@onelist.com
> > Subject: RE: [motm] PaulBr's multiples
> > Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 3:55 PM
> >
> > From: "Dave Bradley" <daveb@...>
> >
> > Well, it's your choice, Stooge brother. You can avoid 15 minutes of work
> and
> > stare at those unevenly spaced rows of jacks for the rest of your
> > synthesizing life...
> >
> > Stooge Leader Moe
> >
> >
> > > > If that doesn't work, how about cutting off one or both of the legs,
> > > > fabricating your own that fit between the jacks and then
> > > riveting them to
> > > > the bracket plate?
> > >
> > > Oh sure, that would work Dave. Geesh, that sure is a hell of a
> > > lot of work
> > > though. You could keep one leg, cut off the other and rivet or bolt
> on
> a
> > > corner brace (commonly called "L" bracket). Damn, I thought I
> > > was going to
> > > get out of this easy.
>