I vote for this order:
1. SEM VCF
2. FFB
3. Cloud Generator
But I also want to second Bill & Will's enthusiasm for a modular
parametric EQ with voltage control!
skw
On Feb 16, 2009, at 8:50 PM, wjhall11 wrote:
> Hear, hear.
>
> Will and I discussed it -
>
> 1. Cloud Generator ('cause it's nearly done, right?)
> 2. then we'd gladly take on the SEM VCF
> 3. then for sure the FFB (and that's almost done too, right?)
>
> But we confess that we appreciate Mr Eldhardt's idea about the 1U
> Parametric EQ that could be banked up three or four in a line. Like
> Ken, we have an interest in imitative synthesis and this sounds like a
> unique offering (although perhaps fewer would be interested <shrug>).
>
> But, Paul - what ever you end up doing, we'll support it.
>
> Bill and Will
>
>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, eric f <ach_gott@...> wrote:
>>
>> I would go for C then B then A. But really they should be
> prioritized in terms of time to market.
>>
>> cheers,
>> eric f
>>
>> --- On Mon, 2/16/09, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> wrote:
>> From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
>> Subject: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'
>> To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
>> Date: Monday, February 16, 2009, 6:30 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> After reading everyone's inputs for what is desired for
> a DIY/pc board only
>>
>> (or module, but all in old fashioned through-hole technology) I've
> decided
>>
>> to work on the SEM VCF with Voltage-Controlled Output Morphing.
>>
>>
>>
>> For all you solder jockeys out there, it will be as complicated as
>> the
>>
>> MOTM-480 VCF. But with ∗more∗ parts. Yippee.
>>
>>
>>
>> In order to take advantage of all it can do, it will have 6 panel
> controls
>>
>> but 11 jacks. I plan to use a standard BR-1 bracket/MOTM pc board
>> size
>>
>> ∗unless∗ the layout goes south and won't fit. It will be ∗very∗
>> dense.
>>
>>
>>
>> There will be 2 audio inputs, voltage-controlled resonance and
>>
>> voltage-controlled output morphing (along with HP/BP/LP/Notch ∗fixed∗
>>
>> outputs). The MORPH sweeps between HP/BP/LP on a dedicated output.
>>
>>
>>
>> Even though it uses 'vintage' op amps, I just checked Digikey/Mouser
> and
>>
>> they have tons in stock. There are several LM13700 dual OTAs but
> again not
>>
>> an issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, one last 'poll':
>>
>>
>>
>> What would you rather see ∗first∗:
>>
>>
>>
>> a) some sort of FFB/parametric EQ boards?
>>
>>
>>
>> b) the SEM VCF boards?
>>
>>
>>
>> c) the Cloud Generator in all it's assembled SMT glory?
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul S.
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>