Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: RE: [motm] Quantizer modules (was List of...)

From: "Greg James" <gjames@...>
Date: 2009-02-16

“The longer this function remains unaddressed…”

 

Exactly the reason why I bought my 4 OMSVC-ADSR’s and 2 OMS 804s from Paul (Krisp1) over the last several months.I can’t wait years for essential modules.

 

Don’t get me wrong, the esotericstuff is great. But I want to build upon a core, well-spec’d, MOTMquality, analog system.

 

-Greg

 

From:motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of eric f
Sent: Monday, February 16, 200910:46 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [motm] Quantizer modules(was List of...)

 

Any quantizer delivered by Synth Tech would have to offer features that are significantly different from the current offerings on the market.  Apart from using tuning tables (which would allow it to be used like a sequencer when driven from an LFO or the 730) and thereby allowing microtuning (mentioned in another email), I can't think of anything.  It would have to be partnered with another function. 

There's also, as John alludes to, the time to market factor.  The longer this function remains unaddressed in the product line, the more likely users are to pursue and purchase existing solutions, of which there are several.

cheers,
eric f



--- On Sun, 2/15/09, John L Rice <Drummer@...> wrote:

From: John L Rice <Drummer@...>
Subject: RE: [motm] Re: List of proposed/discussed modules
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 15, 2009, 5:34 PM

A quantizer is high on my list but unless something else comes along that
seems like a better fit, I'll be getting the Modcan 55B.

John L Rice

-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups. com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
Richard Brewster
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 3:19 PM
To: cormallen
Cc: motm@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: List of proposed/discussed modules

I use quantizers quite a bit. I have two Wiard/Blacet Miniwaves and
also a Modcan Dual Quantizer 55B. The Modcan is a very nice quantizer
with all the features I need. But if Paul Schreiber makes any control
voltage module with a quantizer, I'll be in for one or two of those.

Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix. com

cormallen wrote:

> I'd ∗love∗ a CV quantizer - I've tried using my Miniwaves for
> quantization, but 8-bit lookup tables aren't accurate enough for
> pleasant tuning! Ideally a quantizer with at least two channels...
>
> On the list below, I'd be particularly interested in the 130 Pan/Fade,
> 810 VC-EG, 2?? Delay and 450 FFB. (Oh, and the vocoder, if I could
> afford it!)
>
> (I'm also really tempted by the modcan vector fader. Anyone made a
> black panel for that one?)
>
> Harry
>

------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links