Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: [motm] stopping LFO modulation on 410 + OMS 410

From: Aaron Day <aaron@...>
Date: 2009-02-05

Adam, Scott,

To borrow Aaron Lanterman's term..... ∗facepalm∗-->unplug the OMS unit...

Thanks for your responses. The problem isn't my MOTM its my OMS-410. I bought it from another listmember years ago and never used it much as there was a problem with the LFo connection. I now see that that isn't the only issue. I will contact Tony and see if he can help me.

best,

ad



On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Adam Schabtach wrote:


I agree with Scott. I have two MOTM 410s and both of them operate as expected when you turn the Depth knob to zero, i.e. there is no audible change in frequencies of the filters.
 
--Adam

From: motm@yahoogroups. com [mailto:motm@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Scott Juskiw
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:01 AM
To: Aaron Day
Cc: MOTM List; Oakley Synths
Subject: Re: [motm] stopping LFO modulation on 410 + OMS 410

Yes, I think you have a problem there. I have two of the MOTM/OMS 410 
combos and both of them exhibit no change in frequency when the LFO 
depth pot drops below the 1.5 mark.

On 5-Feb-09, at 4:53 AM, Aaron Day wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am making an effort to re-discover my 410 + OMS 410.
>
> I just realized that on my unit there is no way to reduce LFO "depth"
> to zero i.e. when the rate and depth controls are set to "0" there is
> still a very slow sweep. This was never an issue for me in the past
> when I wanted constantly evolving motion from the unit but now it is.
>
> Ideally I'd like to control the 3 BPFs from the CV input of my OMS-410
> in a way that I can get reproducible settings.
>
> Is this behavior normal or is there a build error in my 410 or oms410?
>
> ad