In a message dated 1/1/2000 1:47:00 PM,
jlarryh@... writes:
>Well, at least those people could add and do understand that we are still
>365 days away from the new millennium. <grin> Or course, there is still
>that "early calendar error thing" to consider.
Which I agree with, but that also leads to this being the last year of both
the 20th century and the 1990s, which is even more confusing.
Hey Larry! I finally realized why they call the instrument a Juno 6 -- as in
six voice polyphony. It took me a few days after the 4051 must mean 8 voice
for me to get it!
I have the operation manual for the Juno
>60, which is essentially the same as the 6. If you think any of it would
>be useful, I would be happy to copy any or all of it. It is not that thick
>as (for the most part), these are fairly simple (but good sounding)
>machines. Probably one of the most useful part for Juno 6 owners would
>be
>the panel drawing you can copy and use to "save" your patches, ala MOTM
>style. In fact, the actual parameter settings for the original factory
>sounds of the Juno 60 are all listed so you can dial them in. SOME of
>them
>are pretty good (like that simple Genesis style organ patch).
I might just take you up on that, just out of curiosity's sake! I've been
using this one mainly with complex (usually VC) pulse division clocking the
appeggiator, which can get very sequencer like (can't imagine why they didn't
build a sequencer into this thing).
I'm still trying to get a tape together for you, so no hurry!
JB