|previous by date||index||next by date|
|previous in topic||topic list|
>From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>Yes, I forgot to mention that during the testing, I had to tweak the Moog
>> MOTM 300 VCO vs. Moog 901B VCO:
>> Note: There is a big difference in functionality between these two! The
>> Moog 901B has a wide range but isn't terribly linear.
>The RA Moog tracking is 10 times ∗worse∗ than a '300.
>Hmm, does that mean if I found some good capacitors, I would be able to
> >Mine have recently
>> been calibrated and do well over 5 octaves with the 8' octave range
>> setting. This doesn't hold true for the other octave range settings.
>That's be cause he had truble finding good capacitors.
>> When mixed together, the beating between these twoSo this is just a minor difference between the tracking? The funny thing
>> oscillators is ∗really∗ intense. I had them beating about once every 10
>> seconds but the sweep caused by the phase interaction was like a very wild
>> PWM with a pronounced almost sawtooth modulation. I could not get this
>> kind of beating between like oscillators on the Moog or the MOTM. There
>> something really wild happening when combining these different oscillators
>> running off different power supplies.
>What you are hearing is the Moog not tracking with the '300. It's not the
>This is just the difference in ∗relative∗ tracking with the Encore as the